WASHINGTON DC & FEDERAL CORRIDOR
Compliance-First Code: When Every Architecture Decision Gets Audited
Your FedRAMP authorization took 18 months. The auditor is asking about a data flow that exists but isn't documented. The control narrative describes a system that was modified 47 times since certification.
DC Federal Tech Analysis
The Compliance Documentation Gap
Based on LOOM analysis of codebases from DC-area federal contractors and GovTech companies, 2024-2025.
What We See in Federal Tech Codebases
The Authorization Boundary Problem
Your FedRAMP boundary was defined in 2021. Since then, you've added 14 third-party integrations, moved two services to a new cloud region, and "temporarily" allowed data flow to a development environment. The boundary diagram shows none of this.
Audit reality: "Describe your actual data flows" shouldn't require archaeology
The Legacy Modernization Trap
The agency mandated cloud migration. The contractor built a "lift and shift." Now you have mainframe architecture running in AWS, with cloud-native additions bolted on. Two paradigms, one system, zero coherent documentation.
DC pattern: Modernization that preserves legacy complexity
The Multi-Contract Codebase
Contract A built the foundation. Contract B added features. Contract C is maintaining it. Each contractor documented their piece. Nobody documented how the pieces connect. The next contract will inherit all of it.
Government reality: Institutional knowledge leaves with each contract transition
The SBOM Mandate
Executive Order 14028 requires software bill of materials. Your codebase has 1,847 dependencies. Some are documented. Some are transitive. Some were added by a contractor who left. Generating an accurate SBOM requires knowing what you actually have.
Compliance pressure: You can't list what you don't know you're using
Why Federal Tech Needs Different Tooling
Federal technology operates under constraints that commercial tech doesn't face. Every architectural decision can become evidence in an audit. Every data flow needs to be documented and justified.
But the codebases themselves evolve like any other software—features get added, integrations get built, "temporary" solutions become permanent. The gap between documentation and reality grows with every sprint.
LOOM generates architecture documentation from code, not memory. When the auditor asks how data flows, you have an answer that's accurate by definition.
DC Metro Tech Ecosystem
Tysons Corner / Reston
Defense contractors and intelligence community. Codebases with clearance requirements and compliance frameworks stacked on compliance frameworks.
Bethesda / Rockville
Healthcare IT and NIH contractors. HIPAA meets federal requirements. Double the compliance, double the documentation burden.
Downtown DC
GovTech startups and civic tech. Commercial companies selling to government. FedRAMP authorization as a competitive advantage.
Is LOOM Right for Your DC Team?
Skip If...
- You're not subject to federal compliance frameworks
- Your authorization boundary is simple and well-documented
- You're a new startup with no government contracts yet
Essential If...
- FedRAMP, FISMA, or CMMC audits are part of your world
- Your system has evolved since initial authorization
- Contract transitions have created documentation gaps
Generate Audit-Ready Architecture Documentation
Start with our free Browser Security Scanner, then join the waitlist for compliance-focused codebase analysis.